RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2002;95:381-385
doi:10.1258/jrsm.95.8.381
© 2002 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kwong, P Y P
Right arrow Articles by Teale, J D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2002;95:381-385
© 2002 The Royal Society of Medicine

Screening for sulphonylureas in the investigation of hypoglycaemia

P Y P Kwong MSc MRCPath     J D Teale BSc PhD  

SAS Hormone Laboratory, Clinical Laboratory, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XX, UK

Correspondence to: Pandina Kwong, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, King George Hospital, Barley Lane, Goodmayes IG3 8YB, UK E-mail: pandina.kwong{at}rbhc-tr.nthames.nhs.uk

The most important cause of hypoglycaemia in the presence of high insulin and C-peptide concentrations is insulinoma. However, a similar picture arises from use of sulphonylureas, which is sometimes covert. All specimens received in two years by a supraregional assay service laboratory from adults with low glucose and inappropriately high insulin and C-peptide concentrations were tested for sulphonylureas by a radioimmunoassay that employed antibodies to glibenclamide. In sulphonylurea-positive cases a questionnaire was sent to the consultant responsible for the patient, to elicit further information.

Samples from 93 adult patients met the criteria, and 34 (37%) of these gave a positive result on screening for sulphonylureas. The consultants provided further information on 31 of the 34, and in 20 the presence of a sulphonylurea was unexpected. In 10 the features were such as to raise the possibility of factitious drug ingestion.

A simple screening technique applied to specimens from patients with hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia indicated that, in a substantial proportion of cases, the patient was taking a sulphonylurea.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Units Symbols and Abbreviations Sixth edition